Appendix to Section VI

Volume V: Part II pp. 1140–1151

## Śakti ( vide under Devi
Durgā, Kālī, Kuṇḍalini, cakras, five Makāras) ; conceived to be the primordial source govern-ing all activity in the universe, different names of Ś. or Kālī in Purāṇas like Matsya, Kūrma, Brahma, doctrine of Vedānta that brahma is endowed with all powers might have suggested all engrossing power of Ś. ; ideas associated with Ś. and Śacī in Ṛg. are those of creation, protection, valour and bounty ; is all pervading, most subtle, is the Kuṇḍalini coiled like a snake and mani-fests herself in the form of the fifty letters of the alphabet from a to kṣa ; name Bhadrākālī occurs in Śaṅ. gr. and Manu ; Kaulāvali-nirṇaya asserts that if a man, after partaking of bhāṅg, enga-ges in meditation, he directly sees the deity, praise of Devī spoken of as primordial Śakti, that all gods including Śiva himself derive their powers from her ; Ṛgveda speaks of the Ś. of the great gods, but they are Śaktis of the gods and not separate cre-ative principles ; śāstras opposed to Veda like Kāpāla, Bhairava, Yāmala, Vāma, Ārhața were propagated by ( vide under 'women') : means the ‘woman associated with a sādhaka in Yogic prac-tices and in the worship of Śakti , young courtesan is Ś. incarnate and brahma
*Poona Orientalist*
a journal
A. D.)
gives a confused account about persecution of Buddhists by Kumārila and Śaṅkarācārya
Annals of Bhandarkar Oriental Institute; 3
(on a modern Siddha Śivayogin ), (on Bhavadāsa ), (on Gītā .4 ), (present author's paper on ‘Brief sketch of the PMS’), (pre-sent author's paper ‘Pūrva-mīmāṁsā’), (Śaṅkha-dharmasūtra )
Appayya Dīkṣita
a. of Kalpataruparimala ; a. of Vidhirasāyana, (conflict about his date), a. of Madhvatantramukhamardana
Bhavanātha (between-
Bose
D. N., a. of ‘Tantras, their philosophy and occult secrets,’ (explains five makāras esoterically )
Guenther
Dr. H. V. , a of 'Yuganaddha' ( the Tāntrik view of life ); ( explains away what is meant by intercourse with cāṇḍāla women etc. ); relies on Buddhist Tantras only and tries to prove that Buddhist Tāntrikas endeavour to restore life in its entirety which is neither an indulgence in passions nor a rejection of nor escape from them ; views of, briefly stated and criticized
Guhyasamājātantra ( probably of 6th century A. D. ) : ( vide under Asaṅga
siddhis ); ( contains late elements ), etc. ; makes provision for endowing Sādhaka with miraculous powers such as killing enemy with magical rites, causing rainfall in a drought ; mentions the six magical cruel rites ; puts forward a quick and short method for realizing Buddhahood and for attainment of Siddhis through Yoga ; Siddhis are sāmānya ( ordinary, such as becoming invisible ) and Uttama ( best, viz. attaining Buddhahood ) ; sets forth six aṅgas of Yoga ( omitting the first three of Patañjali and adding Anusmṛti ), teaching of G. is that if psychical powers and siddhis are to be developed females must be associated with those who undertake Yoga practices
Hazra
Prof. R. C. ; a of
Hevajratantra
edited and translated by Dr. D. L. Snellgrove
Indian Historical Quarterly 30
(Pargiter criticized), . , (Inscription of Rajaraja in A. D in which Mimāṁsāśāstra is said to have Chap.), (problem of 'Taduktam' sūtras), (paper on 'Vṛttikāras of Pūrvamīmāṁsā-sūtra'), (Prof. Renou criticized)
IV
papers on Tantra
Jayaswal
K. P. (a. of ‘History of India’ ) : , (on origin of week-days), (published the historical portion of Yugapurāṇa), (papers on Purāṇas ), (on explanation of Mañjuśrīmūlakalpa ), (a. of ‘Imperial History of India’, which deals with parts of Mañjuśrīmūlakalpa ) ; (on Hāthīgumpha Ins.) ; (holds that ancient India had republics)
Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 186n
Jñānasiddhi of Indrabhūti (of about 717 A. D.); 1050
(yogin may secure libera-tion by those very actions by which ordinary men suffer torture in Hell), (symbolical meaning of vajra and coitus with Caṇḍāli or Dombikā), (on gurus and warning against false gurus), on abhiṣeka in Tantra, (date etc.)
Kapali Sastry: a. of ‘Ṛgbhāṣya-bhūmikā’ in English 981
bitterly attacks Sāyaṇa but admits that Sāyaṇa is not only useful but indispensable to Vedic students ; inaccuracies of renderings of Ṛgveda verses and words by K. pointed out , on ‘Veda and Tantra’ ; rendering of ‘Kavayāḥ satyaśrutāḥ’ occurring only thrice in Ṛg. shown to be entirely wrong
Kulārṇava Tantra 35n
( Śiva declared to Pārvatī ), ( even Caṇḍāla knowing Kauladharma superior to a brāhmaṇa, master of four Vedas, but ignorant of Kula-dharma ), ( eulogy of women ), ( on false gurus ), (how Kaulas behaved outwardly), ( on the verse pītvā pītvā etc. ), (guru's greatness ), (five constituents of puraścaraṇa ), ( on Dīkṣā and its derivation), ( on nyāsa ), (for date); appears to be in two minds, in one breath recommending drinking of wine and eating flesh and also waxing eloquent over the highest Vedānta and fastens esoteric meanings on the makāras
Maheśvara Tantra 1051 (names of Vaiṣṇava tantras)
Manjuśrī-mūlakalpa 1040 (has late elements )
Murārimīśra
founder of a third school of Mīmāṁsā ( between A. D. )
Niṣpannayogāvalī of Abhayākara-gupta
Buddhist Tāntrik work
Pandit M. P.
a. of ‘Lights on Tantra’ ; criticized
Papers of
on Tantra
Rele
Dr. V. G., a. of ‘Mysterious Kundalini’ , (criticized by Shri Kuvalayananda)
Rudrayāmala
a Tāntrik work, (on cakras and Sahasrāracakra); (a Vīra Sādhaka could associate with another’s wife as Śakti in worship)
Sannipatopakārāka (actions or rites); are also called Sāmavāyika or āśrayī-karmāṇi 1254; are acts such as the pounding of grains
prokṣaṇa (sprinkling water over substances etc.) i. e. they are Saṁskāra (make something fit or embellish)
Snellgrove
Dr. D. L., editor of ‘ Hevajra-tantra ’
Sādhanamālā (a composite Vajrayāna work of 3rd century A. D. to 12th): 1038-39
(six cruel magic acts), asserts that there is nothing that cannot be attained by mantras if proper procedure be followed
Tantra (or tantras
acc. to context): ; (vide under Cakrapūjā, China, guhya, guru, Kauladharma, magic, magicians, Mahānirvāṇatantra, makāras, months, nāḍis, puraścaraṇa, śakti, śāktas, Śāradātilaka, siddhis, Śrīvidyāmantra, spells, tāntrika, tattva, Tibet, Vajrayāna vāmācāra, yantra) ; aims of T. were mokṣa and attainment of siddhis, are Hindu, Buddhist and Jaina and are alike in some respects but differ in some others , are upaveda of Atharvaveda, acc. to Śukranītisāra ; Bhairavi-cakra, and tattva cakra worship and n; Buddhist T. deified important personages of Buddhism and took over other deities, Gaṇeśa, Sarasvati and others ; Buddhist T. also claimed to show the path to the attainment of all objects from success in love affairs to liberation ; Cakrapūjā, a revolting rite ; derivation of word Tantra ; differences and similarities between Buddhist and Hindu tantras ; difficulty of defining a T. ; Durgā acc. to Mahānirvāṇa T., is highest prakṛti of Paramātman, has various names ; end and aim of a few higher minds among some tantras and Tāntrikas was attainment of high spiritual powers by Yoga practices and realization of supreme Tattva, variously called Brahma, Śiva, Devī and mokṣa ; evidence of any Buddhist works on Tantras before A. D. practically none, evidence in Bāṇa's works of the prevalence of Tantrik and Śākta worship in India before 7th century A. D. ; famous Chinese travellers Fa Hien, Yuan Chwang and I-tsing do not refer to study of Buddhist T. in India. , five āmnāyas spoken of as paths to mokṣa by some T. ; five paths named in some T. and four in Sādhanamālā 1038n-1039; four named Tantras introduced in Kambuja ( Cambodia ) about A. D. ; Gāyatrī mantra of Kālī set out , great importance of guru and mantra in all Tantras , groups of , and Śaiva T. in Tantrāloka ; guru, after initiating a disciple into T. rites, was to hand over to the neophyte a bowl for drinking wine, mudrā and courtezan ; Haraprasad Sastri's view that T. practices originally came from outside India and view of A. Avalon that they came to India from Chaldea or Śakadvīpa, examined , Hindu T. try to show that they are based on the Vedas. quote Vedic mantras and claim to describe an easier and quicker path to mokṣa ; Hindu T. present two sides, one philosophical, the other popular and magical, relying on mantras, mudrās, cakras and yantras, ignore the great moral danger, involved in the persistent teaching of worship with five makāras and also ignore the advice of Gītā ( III. ), in Kaula system siddhi results from those very substances ( wine, flesh etc. ) by ( resorting to ) which men ( ordinarily ) incur sin , influenced by Sāṅkhya ; important Kashmir Tāutrik works ; Kṣetras of Devi over one hundred acc. to Devībhāgavata, Kulārṇava and other T. praise the vedas; employ vedic mantras and quote Upaniṣads and Bhagavadgītā ; list of Sanskrit works on T. with authors, dates and editions, list of works and papers on T. in English ; literature on T. was vast ; Makāras five, emphasis on, in almost all Tantra works as leading to miraculous powers and liberation, Makāras explained by later writers on T. as used not in the ordinary senses but in special esoteric senses on which the writers themselves differ ; Mantras called bīja like hrīm´ and śrīm and a list of them called Bījanighapṭu ; Mantra of ten syllables ´ hrīm śrīm krīm parameśvarī svāhā. by merely listening to which a man becomes jīvanmukta but Mahānirvāṇa adds that mantras do not confer siddhi unless five makāras are offered ; Maṇḍalas, an item in T. worship, 1131ff; Mantras are the very core of T. and T. is often called Mantraśāstra ; Mantras of Śakti do not confer perfection · unless one follows kula practices ; mantras that the followers of Vāmamārga may employ about three makāras ( wine, mudrā and coitus ) ; Mantra ‘saccidekam brahma’ is best ; mantra ‘brahmārpapam brahma’ ( Bhagavadgītā IV. ) to be recited when offering wine and other tattvas to the highest
Tarka (ratiocination) and Dharmaśāstra 1468-1482; (vide ‘Nyāya’
‘people’, ‘tolerance’, ‘Upaniṣads’) ; as an aṅga of Yoga , Buddhists and Jains were declared to be heterodox not because they resorted to T. but because they did not at all acknowledge the authority of the Veda and the sacred tradition ; Manu provides that none but he who considers the dicta of (vedic) sages, the rules of dharma (in smṛtis) and takes the help of tarka not in direct conflict with Veda and śāstras knows what Dharma is and this is the position of most orthodox Sanskrit writers about Tarka, Śaṅkarācārya’s position about T. ; Smṛtis lay down that blindly following the words of śāstra would lead to loss of Dharma and that in case of conflict between two Smṛtis reasoning should be resorted to, smṛtis and ancient Sanskrit writers have been very tolerant of differing views even on fundamental matters and brought about great changes in rituals, philosophical views, social customs, without persecution ; T. alone cannot give final answers or answers acceptable to most people on such questions as the existence of God or of the individual soul, or on what happens after death ; T. favoured by or not opposed to Śruti is acceptable to Br. Up. acc. to Śaṅkarācārya ; within the limits laid down by Śaṅkarācārya and other orthodox Sanskrit writers there was room enough for an enormous and bewildering variety of convictions, rites and practices to claim orthodoxy and examples of these ; wise man who is pure should, in deciding upon dharma and adharma, act after relying on his own' intelligence (reason) ; word 'tarka' occurs in Kaṭho-paniṣad ; Yaj. Smṛti mentions Nyāya (v. l. tarka) as one of the fourteen vidyās and one of the means of knowing dharma
Tārabhaktitaraṁgiṇī
(on Śavasādhanā)
Tārātantra
Vol. VIII.; Vol. X.; Vol. XIV
Yogihṛdaya (last three chap-ters of Nityāṣoḍaśikārṇava are so called)
Z. D. M. G. 647

Mīmāṁsā Nyāyas

अनुष्णाधिकरण
जै. III. 1. 12

Appendix to Section VI

Some important published texts consulted by the author on Tāntricism are set out here. Sanskrit works are arranged in the order of the Sanskrit alphabet, but are transliterated in English and their names are printed in italicṣ Information about authors, dates and editions is set out briefly where available.

Advayavajrasangraha of Advayavajra (11th century A. D.); contains 21 short works on Buddhist philosophy (in G.O.S.), eḍ by H. P. Shastri, with a valuable Introductioṇ

Arya-Mañjuśrīmūlakalpa (published in TSS in three parts and 721 pages); contains parts of different dates (from 4th to 9th century A. D.). It is Buddhist and included in Tibetan Kangyur. It has now 55 chapters, but a Chinese translation of 10th century has only 28 chapterṣ Dr. B. Bhattacharya ascribes it to 2nd century A. D.; but Winternitz disagrees (vide IHQ. IX. pp. 1 ff.). Jayaswal in 'Imperial History of India' gives the text of patalavisara 53 containing 1003 verses, out of which verses 6–344 deal with the biography of Buddha up to his nirvāṇa and real history is given from about 78 A. D. to 8th century A. D. in verses 345–980.

Īśanaśivagurudevapaddhati of Īśanaśivagurudeva miśra, in four parts, Sāmānyapāda, Mantrapāda, Kriyāpāda and Yogapāda; it contains about 18000 ślokas and is published in T. S. S.; it mentions Gautamīya Tantra, Prapañcasāra and Bhojarāja; composed about 1100 A. D. or a little later.

Kāmakalāvilāsa of Puṇyānandanātha, with the commentary Cidvalli of Natanānandanātha (Kashmir S. S.); there are 55 verses with tr. and notes by Arthur Avalon (pub. by Ganesh & Co. Madras, 1953), originally in Tāntrik Texts vol. X.

Kālacakratantra (Buddhist)–Vide J. A. S. B., Letters, vol. XXVIII (1952) pp. 71–76 for an account of this work by Biswanath Bandopadhyaya

Kalajñānanirṇaya—eḍ by Prof. P. C. Bagchi (in Calcutta S. Series, 1934); H. P. Shastri assigned the mṣ of it to 9th century A. D., but Prof. Bagchi (p. 3) places it in the middle of the 11th century A. D. It is ascribed to Matsyendrapāda in the colophonṣ Vide p. 1115, n 1820 above for Matsyendranātha.

Kalivilāsatantra—eḍ by A. Avalon in Tāntrik Texts, vol. VI (1917) in 35 paṭalaṣ In X. 20-21 it frankly allows adultery provided the sexual act is not completeḍ It mentions (in XX. 1) the Kālikāpurāṇa and in XV. 12-13 contains a mantra in a language resembling Assamese and Eastern Bengali.

Kulacūḍāmaṇi-tantra (eḍ by A. Avalon in Tāntrik Texts, vol. IV, 1915) in seven paṭalas and 430 verseṣ In I, 4-12 names of 64 tantras are citeḍ

Kulārṇava-tantra—It is in 17 ullāsas and contains over 2000 verseṣ It is a famous work profusely quoted (published in Tāntrik Texts, vol. V, London, 1917). It is an early tantra, probably composed before 1000 A. D. In the colophons it is said to be a tantra of the Ūrdhvāmnāya (the fifth of the five āmnāyas) and as part of the work of one lakh and a quarter verseṣ Vide A. B. O. R. I. vol. XIII. pp. 206-211 for a paper on ‘Kulārṇava-tantra, its extent and contents’ by Prof. Chintaharan Chakravarti.

Kaulāvalinirṇaya of Jñānānandagiri in twenty-one ullāsas, eḍ by A. Avalon in Tāntrik Texts, vol. XIV; in I. 2-14 names numerous Tantras including yāmalas and in I. 92-93 eight former gurus are nameḍ

Gaṇapatitattva – Old Javanese Text, critically edited, annotated and translated by Dr. ( Mrṣ ) Sudarśadevi Singhal (pub. by International Academy of Sciences, New Delhi, 1958 ); refers to Mūlādhāra and other Cakras with their positions and colours, six aṅgas of Yoga excluding yama, niyama, āsana and adding tarka; gives an account of the production of nāda from Niṣkala and of bindu from nāda and so on, of mantras, bījās &c.

Guhyasamājatantra or Tathāgata-guhyaka (Buddhist): It is published in G. O. S.; it is assigned to 4th century A. D. by Dr. B. Bhattacharya (in Intro. to Sādhanamālā, vol. II, p. XCV); vide p. 1050 above for criticism of this view. It probably belongs to the 5th or 6th century A. D. Vide notes 1673 and 1691. Gorakṣasiddhāntasaṅgraha published in S. B. Texts (1925); mixture of Yoga and Tantra. Cidgaganacandrikā; ascribed to Kālidāsa; eḍ by Trivikramatīrtha in Tāntrik Texts, Vol. XX. Jayākhyasaṃhitā (published in G. O. S.)—a Pāñcarātra work ascribed to 450 A. D. by Dr. B. Bhattacharya; contains some Tantra topics such as Yakṣiṇī-sādhana, Cakrayantra-sādhana, Stambhana. Jñānasiddhi of king Indrabhūti, disciple of Anaṅgavajra and father of guru Padmasambhava; pub. in ‘Two Vajrayāna Texts’ (G. O. S.); assigned to about 717 A. D. (Intro. p. 10); gives in a nutshell leading doctrines of Vajrayāna. Jñānārṇavatantra, pub. by Anaṇ Press, Poona; contains 26 paṭalas and about 2300 verseṣ Tantrarājatantra, eḍ in Tāntrik Texts, vol. VIII and XII and pub. by Ganesh & Co. Madras, 1954, with the commentary Manoramā by Subhagānandanātha; it has 36 chapterṣ It gives an account of the Kādimata. Tantrasāra of Kṛṣṇānanda, pub. in Ch. S. S.; about 17th century A. D. Tantrasāra of Abhinavagupta, a summary of Tantrāloka, pub. in Kashmir S. S. (1918). About the first quarter of 11th century A. D. Tantrūbhidhāna with Bijanighaṇṭu and Mudrānighaṇṭu, eḍ by A. Avalon in Tāntrik Texts, vol. I. (1913). Tantrāloka of Abhinavagupta with the coṃ of Jayaratha, pub. in Kashmir S. S. in several volumes; composed about 1000 A. D. Tārātantra, eḍ by Śrī Girisacandra and pub. in the Gauda-granthamālā No. 1 (1913); in 6 paṭalas and 150 verseṣ It declares that Buddha and Vasiṣṭha were Tāntrik sages of old and nine Kaula gurus whose names end in ‘nātha’ are mentioned; refers to Mahācīnākhya Tantra and provides for devotee (only male) offering his own blood to Tārā. Tārābhaktisudhārṇava, of Narasimha Thakkura, who was 5th in descent from Govinda Thakkura, author of Pradīpa, coṃ on Kāvyaprakāśa; composed about 1680 A. D.; eḍ by Pancaṇan Bhattacharya (in Tāntrik Texts vol. XXI, 1940); a large work in eleven Taraṅgas and 435 pages on the worship of Tārā, one of ten vidyās connected with Śakti (not the Buddhist divinity Tārā). The 9th Taraṅga deals with the horrible rite of Śavaśādhana (pp. 345-351). Tarārahasya of Brahmānanda, pub. by Jīvananda (1896); mentions Mahācīna, Nīlatantra, Yoginītantra, Rudrayāmala. Tripurārahasya of Hārītāyana, with coṃ called Tātparyadīpika of Śrīnivāsa; pub. in S. B. series; it is a discourse by Hārītāyana to Nārada. Tārākhaṇḍa portion of it is philosophical. Tripurāsārasamuccaya of Nāgabhaṭṭa with the coṃ of Govindācārya; pub. by Jīvananda (1897). Dakṣiṇāmūrti-saṃhitā on Śrīvidyopāsanā in 65 paṭalas and about 1700 verses; pub. in S. B. serieṣ Nityāṣoḍaśikārṇava (part of Vāmakeśvaratantra) with the coṃ Setubandha by Bhāskararāya (1700-1750 A. D.); pub. by Anaṇ Press (1944). Nityotsava of Umānandanātha (who bore the name of Jagannātha before dīkṣā and who was a Mahārāṣṭra brāhmaṇa patronized by the Tanjore Maratha Chief); this is a supplement to Bhāsurānandanātha (Bhāskararāya before dīkṣā) and composed the work in Kali era 'rasārṇava-karivedamiteṣu' (Kali 4846 i. e. 1745 A. D.). It is probable that the word arṇava is used for seven instead of for 4 as usual (i. e. 4876, equal to 1775 A. D.); pub. in G. O. S. (1923). Niṣpannayogāvali of Abhayākaragupta, a contemporary of King Rāmapāla of Bengal (1084-1130 A. D.). It is Buddhist. The author was a Professor at the Vikramśilā University in Bihar; describes 26 maṇḍalas, each having a central deity and other minor Buddhist deities that sometimes exceed 100. It is valuable for later Buddhism, its pantheon and ritual; pub. in G. O. S. (1949). Paraśurāmakalpasūtra, with coṃ Saubhāgyodayā of Rāmeśvara, pub. in G. O. S. (1923); earlier than 1300 A. D.; claims to be composed by Paraśurāma, son of Jamadagni and chief disciple of Lord Mahādeva. Pādukāpañcakā, eḍ by A. Avalon in Tantrik Texts, vol. II (1913). Pārānandasūtra, pub. in G. O. S. (1931); not earlier than 900 A. D., says Dr. B. Bhaṭṭācārya. Prajñopāya-viniścaya-siddhi of Anaṅgavajra, one of the 84 siddhas venerated in Tibet; Buddhist Vajrayāna work pub. in G. O. S. (1929); composed about 705 A. D. acc. to Dr. B. Bhattacharya in Intro. p. XII.

Prapañcasāra (ascribed to Śaṅkarācārya) with coṃ Vivaraṇa by Padmapāda; pub. in Tāntrik Texts (vol. III) and later a new ed in vol. XVIII–XIX (1939). Vide p. 1105 above. In 36 paṭalaṣ

Prāṇatoṣiṇi, compiled by Rāmatosaṇa Bhaṭṭacharya and pub. by Jivananda (Calcutta); it is a very large modern work in 1097 pageṣ

Brahmasaṁhitā, with the commentary of Jīva Gosvāmī; for Vaiṣṇavas; pub. in Tāntrik texts, vol. XV.

Mantramahodadhi of Mahīdhara with his own commentary; composed in Vikrama year 1645 (1588–89) A. D.; pub. by Jīv. and Venk. Presṣ

Mahānirvāṇatantra, with the coṃ of Hariharānanda Bhāratī. It is a leading but late work on Tantra, published very often; eḍ by A. Avalon in Tāntrik Texts, vol. XIII in 14 Ullāsas as the first part; the eḍ of 1929 by Ganesh & Co. has been used in this work; the third eḍ of 1953 differs slightly here and there.

Mālyaka-cakra-viveka of Svataṇtrānandanātha, with the coṃ of Śivānanda; pub. in S. B. series, 1934.

Māheśvaratantra, in 51 paṭalas and 3060 verses (pub. in Ch. S. S.); mentions that Tantras are 64 (1. 15 and 26. 11) and names 25 Vaiṣṇava tantras (26. 16–20) and holds that Bauddha tantras are misleading and meant for cruel rites (26. 21–22).

Merutantra; extensive work in 35 chapters, 821 pages and about 16000 verses; pub. by Venk. Press, Bombay, 1908.

Yoginitantra, published by Jivananda; q. by Raghunandana in Ekadāśītattva p. 58.

Yoginīhṛdaya—the last three chapters of Nityaṣoḍaśikārṇava (VI–VIII) are so calleḍ

Yoginīhṛdayadīpikā of Amṛtānandanātha, disciple of Puṇyānan-danātha, pub. in S. B. series, 1923; about 10th or 11th century A. D.

Rudrayāmalatantra, eḍ by Jivananda (2nd eḍ in 1892). A very extensive work in 66 chapters and in over 6000 verseṣ . (mostly in Anuṣṭubh metre), supposed to have been declared by Bhairavī to Bhairava (Śiva). It was said to be a huge work in a lakh and a quarter ślokas, e. g. D. C. mṣ No. 667 (i) of 1895-1902 called Dhanadāpurascaraṇavidhi states in the colophon that it is part of the Rudrayāmala (iti Rudrayāmala-sapādalakṣagrantho... Kiṅkiṇī-tantrokta-Dhanadā-purāscaraṇa-vidhiḥ; BORI cat. of msṣ, vol. XVI. on Tantra p. 247).

Lalitāsahasranāma with the coṃ Saubhāgyabhāskara of Bhāskararāya son of Gambhīrarāya, minister of the Bījapur Moslem king ; written in saṁvat 1785 i. e. 1729 A. D. ; Nir. eḍ of 1935.

Varivasyārahasya of Bhāskararāya (called Bhāsurānandanātha after dīkṣā) with his own coṃ called Prakāśa. He flourished between 1700-1750 A. D.; pub. at Adyar, 1934.

Viṣṇu-saṃhitā in 30 paṭalas; pub. in T. S. S. 1925.

Śakti-saṅgamatantra, in four parts, viz. Kālī, Tārā, Sundarī and Chinnamastā; three parts dealing with the first three pub. in G. O. S.; between 1505-1607 A. D. Vide Poona Orientalist, vol. XXI. pp. 47-49 (between 1530-1700 A. D.).

Śakti-sūtra—Vide Sarasvatībhāvana Studies, vol. X. (pp. 182-187); has 113 sūtras and coṃ on 19 sūtras; attributed to Agastya by the commentary: the sūtra mentions Jaiminī and Vyāsa.

Śāktapramoda (a recent work), compiled by Śrīrājadevanandasiṁha, chief of Śīvahara; pub. by Venk. Press, 1951; contains 17 tantras viz. Kālitantra, tantras called Ṣoḍaśī, Bhuvaneśvarī, Chinnamastā, Tripurabhairavī, Dhūmavatī, Bagalāmukhī, Mātāṅgī, Kamalātmikā, Kumārikā, Balidāna-krama, Durgā, Śiva, Gaṇeśa, Sūrya, Viṣṇu.

Śāradātilaka of Lakṣmaṇa-deśikendra (disciple of Utpala); one of the most famous works on tantra. Aufrecht (p. 64) enumerates several commentaries, the most learned and lucid of which is the Padārthādarśa of Rāghavabhaṭṭa, composed in saṁvat 1550 (i e. 1493-94 A. D.). Rāghavabhaṭṭa hailed from Mahārāṣṭra and was a resident of town Janasthāna (Pañcavaṭī) on the banks of the Godāvarī; pub. in Kashi S. S. and in Tāntrik Texts, vol. XVI and XVII. Śāradātilaka was composed about the 11th century A. D. Raghunandana expressly names Rāghavabhaṭṭa as the commentator of the Śāradatilaka in Jyotistattva p. 580. Śricakrasambhāratantra—A Buddhist work; Tibetan text and English translation by Lama Kazi Dawa Samdup and edited in Tantrik Texts, vol. VII by A. Avalon, 1919. Śyāmārahasya of Pūrṇānanda in 16 chapters, eḍ by Jivananda; 16th century A. D. Ṣaṭ-cakra nirūpaṇa, of Pūrṇānanda in 85 verses; pub. in Tāntrik Texts, vol. II; composed śaka 1499 (i. e. 1577–78 A. D. ). Sanatkumāra-tantra–is a dialogue between Sanatkumāra and Pulastya in eleven paṭalas and about 375 verseṣ Published by Jyestharam Mukundji in Bombay in 1905. It is a mixture of Yoga and tāntrik technique and inculcates the worship of Kṛṣṇa in Tāntrik bījas like ‘klīm, gauṁ &c’. Sādhanamālā, published in two volumes in G. O. S. with a long Intro. to vol. II by Dr. B. Bhattacharya; contains 312 Sādhanas, many of which are anonymous and are known to Tibetan Kangyur; Dr. Bhattacharya states that the Sādhanas range in dates from third century A. D. to 12th century A. D. Winternitz, in I. H. Q. vol. IX (pp. 5–6 ), does not accept the view that the Prajñāpāramitāsādhana was composed by Asaṅga. Sāmrājya lakṣmi-pīṭhikā—said to be part of Ākāśa-bhairava Mahātantra, published in Tanjore Sarasvati Mahal Series in 139 chapters, of which the first 30 are connected with mantra, japa, homa,; chapters 31 ff deal in detail with departments of State, coronation (chap. 43 ff ) and festivals like those of New Year, Rāmanavami, Navarātra, &c. Sekoddeśatīkā—a Buddhist work of Śrīnāpadāa,; text eḍ by Mario E. Carelli in G. O. S. with an Intro. in English. Saundaryalaharī, ascribed to the great Śaṅkarācārya, has numerous commentaries; eḍ by Sir John Woodroffe and pub. at Adyar (1937); eḍ of 1957 with three commentaries and English translation published by Ganeṣh & Co. Madraṣ There is an excellent edition of this work in 100 verses (text, English translation by Prof. W. Norman Brown, Harvard University Press, 1958). Śrīvidyāratnasūtra, attributed to Gauḍapāda (in 101 sūtras) with the commentary of Śaṅkarācārya, pupil of Vidyāraṇya, on 21 sūtras; eḍ by Pandit Gopinatha Kaviraja in S. B. Texts series, Benares (1924).

_Haṁsavilāsa_, of Haṁsamithu; pub. in G. O. S. (1937); the author was born in Gujarat in Vikrama year 1794 on Phālguna Full moon day (1738 A. D.). Though not a purely Tāntrik work it quotes many Tāntrik works such as the Kulārṇava (pp. 68–76), Kaularahasya (p. 104), Yogini-tantra (p. 103), Śāradātilaka (pp. 84–85, 105 ff). It deals with many other topics such as figures of speech, erotic subjectṣ

_Hevajratantra_, edited and translated by Dr. D. L. Snellgrove (Oxford University Press, 1959), in two partṣ This work came to the author's hands while this Appendix was passing through the Presṣ Part I (pub. in 1959) contains Introduc- tion (pp. 1–46), English translation (pp. 47–119), contents (pp. 121–125), diagrams (pp. 126–129), Glossary (pp. 131–141) and Index (pp. 142–190); Part II contains Sanskrit texts and Tibetan texts based on a Nepalese mṣ lent by Prof. Tucci; coṃ called Yogaratnamālā by Pandita Kanha has been included from an old Bengali mṣ The editor holds (part I p. 14) that Hevajratantra was in existence towards the end of 8th century A. D. and that Advayavajra-saṅgraha and Sekoddeśaṭīka borrow from Hevajra-tantra. Sādhanamālā No. 229 (two opening verses) are the same as Hevajra II. 8. 6–7. Hevajra is an invocation of vajra. On p. 11 part I the editor questions how the yogins could call themselves Buddhists when they experienced enlightenment in the embrace of a yoginī. Part I p. 70 mentions Jālandhara, Oḍḍiyāna, Paurṇagiri as pīṭhas and several upapīṭhas, upa-kṣetraṣ The term Śakti does not occur in Hevajra but its place is taken by Prajñā. Part II verses 11–15 p. 98 express how the followers of this tantra had sexual experiences with women called mudrās and how thereby they secured siddhi. Part I p. 54 contains ritual for gaining mastery over a young womaṇ Part II p. 2 states ‘Hekā-reṇa mahākaruṇā vajram Prajñā ca bhaṇyate; Prajñopāyāt-makam tantram tan-me nigaditam śṛṇu’. This is a very valuable addition to the literature on Tantra and has been very well editeḍ

Some important works and papers on Tantra—vide also note 1687 for works on Śakti cult. Catalogue of Palm-leaf and some paper msṣ in the Durbar Library of Nepal, by M. M. H. P. Sastri (1905). Tāranāth’s History of Buddhism in India (translated into German by A. Schleifner (St. Petersburg, 1869). Portions were translated into English in I. A. IV. 101 ff. and 361 ff. ‘Lamaism’ by L. A. Waddell (Allen & Co., London, 1895). ‘History of Buddhism in India and Tibet’ by Bu-stone translated from Tibetan by Dr. E. Obermiller. Descriptive catalogue of mss in the Library of Asiatic Society of Bengal, vol. VIII (deals with 648 msṣ on Tantra in 892 pages). Bhandarkar’s Vaiṣṇavism, Śaivism &c. (in collected works, vol. IV. pp. 202–210 on Śāktas). Tantra of the Great Liberation (translation of the Mahānirvāṇa Tantra) with Introduction and commentary by Arthur Avalon (1913). Tantrik Texts edited by A. Avalon, vol. I–XXII, Introductions, notes, analysis &c. The Serpent Power by A. Avalon (1914), containing translation of Ṣaṭ-cakranirūpaṇa and Pādukāpañcaka (5th eḍ of 1953, by Ganesh & Co., Madras). ‘Principles of Tantra’ parts 1 and 2, eḍ by A. Avalon (1914, 1916) with a long Introduction to part 2. ‘Wave of Bliss’—translation of Ānanda-laharī (first fortyone verses of Saundarya-laharī) and comments by Sir John Woodroffe (1917). ‘Wave of Beauty’–translation of Saundarya-laharī (with text and commentaries) pub. by Ganesh & Co. (Madras, 1957). ‘Chakras’ by Right Rev. C. W. Leadbeater (Adyar, 1927) with plateṣ ‘Śivasamhitā’ - translation of - by Shrischandra Vidyarnava. ‘Thirty minor Upaniṣads’ translated by K. Narayanswami Aiyar. ‘Mysterious Kuṇḍalinī’ by Dr. V. G. Rele (1927). ‘Śakti or Divine Power’ by Dr. Sudhendu Kumar Das (Uni. of Calcutta, 1934). P. C. Bagchi's 'Introduction to Kaulajñāna-nirṇaya (Calcutta Sanskrit Series, 1934). 'Tibetan Yoga and secret doctrines' by W. Y. Evans-Wentz (Oxford Uni. Press, 1935). P. C. Bagchi's 'Studies in Tantras' (Cal. Uni. 1939). Dr. B. Bhattacharya's 'Introduction to Sādhanamālā vol. II, (G. O. S.) pp. XI-LXXVII; the same scholar's 'Introduction to Guhyasamājatantra (G. O. S.) and 'Introduction to Buddhist Esoterism' (Oxford University Press, 1932). 'Philosophy of Tripurā Tantra' by M. M. Gopinath Kaviraja in Sarasvati Bhavan Studies (1934), vol. IX. pp. 85-98. 'Some aspects of the philosophy of Śākta Tantra' by M. M. Gopinath Kaviraja in Sarasvati Bhavan Studies, 1938 vol. X. pp. 21-27. 'Buddhist Tantra Literature' by Prof. S. K. De in New Indian Antiquary, vol. 1, pp. 1-23. 'Influence of Tantras on the 'Tattvas of Raghunandana' in I. H. Q. IX. (1933), pp. 678-704 by Prof. R. C. Hazra. 'Influence of Tantra in Smṛtinibandhas' in ABORI vol. 15 pp. 220-235 and vol. XVI. pp. 203-211 by Prof. R. C. Hazra. 'The Tāntric Doctrine of Divine bi-unity' by A. K. Coomara-swamy in A. B. O. R. I. vol. 19. pp. 173-183; 'Comparative and critical study of Mantrasśāstra' by Shri Mohanlal Bhagavandas Jhavery (1944 ); Prof. Chintaharan Chakravarti's following Papers: 'Antiquity of Tantricism' in I. H. Q., vol VI pp. 114 ff; 'Controversy regarding the authorship of Tantras' in Prof. K. B. Pathak commemoration volume pp. 210-220; 'A note on the age and authorship of the Tantras' in Journal and Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal, New Series, vol. XXIX (1933) No. 1 pp. 71-79; 'Ideals of Tantra rites' I. H. Q. vol. X. pp. 468 ff; 'Śākta festivals of Bengal and their antiquity' in I. H. Q. vol. 27 (1951) pp. 255-260; 'Application of Vedic Mantras in Tāntrik rites' in J. A. S. B., Letters, vol. 18 (1952) pp. 113-115; 'Kālī worship in Bengal' Adyar Library Bulletin, vol. XXI, parts 3-4 pp. 296-303; 'Tantras, their philosophy and occult secrets' by D. N. Bose (Calcutta, Oriental Publishing Co.); ‘Vajra and the Vajrasattva’ by Dr. S. B. Das-Gupta in ‘Indian Culture’ vol. VIII, pp. 23-32 ; ‘Introduction to Tāntrik Buddhism’ by Dr. S. B. Das Gupta ( Calcutta, 1950) ; ‘Philosophies of India’ by Heinrich Zimmer (1951) pp. 560-602 ; ‘The Veda and the Tantra’ by Shri T. V. Kapali Sastry ( Madras, 1951 ) pp. 1-255 ; * ‘Yuganaddha’ (which literally means ‘bound together or yoked together’ in the case of opposites ) ‘the Tāntrik view of Life’ by Dr. Herbert V. Guenther in Chowkhamba Sanskrit Series, Banaras, ‘Studies’ vol. III. ( 1952 ) ;

The following articles in the Cultural Heritage of India vol. IV, viz. ‘Evolution of the Tantras,’ by Dr. P. C. Bagchi pp. 211-226 ; ‘Tantra as a way of realization’ by Swami Pratya-gātmānanda, pp. 227-240; ‘The Spirit and Culture of the Tantras’ pp. 241-251 by Mr. Atal Behari Ghosh ; ‘Śakti Cult in South India’ by Shri K. R. Venkataraman, pp. 252-259; Tāntrik culture among the Buddhists’ by Dr. B. Bhattacharya pp. 260-272 ; ‘The cult of the Buddhist Siddhāchāryas’ pp. 273-279 by Prof. P. V. Bapat. 'History of Philosophy, Eastern and Western' eḍ by Dr. S. Radhakrishnan, vol. I, pp. 401-428 on 'Exposition of Śākta belief' by M. M. Gopinath Kaviraj (1953). 'Yoga, immortality and freedom' by Mircea Eliade translated from French by Willard Trask (pub. by Routledge, Kegan, Paul, London, 1958), pp. 200-273 for 'Yoga and Tantrism'. 'Tibetan Book of the Dead' by Dr. W. Y. Evans-Wentz (3rd eḍ, Oxford University Press, 1957). 'Tibetan Yoga' by Bernard Bromage (2nd eḍ 1959 by Aquarium Press) – deals with magical and religious practices of Tibetans, spells, and exercises which are deemed to produce supernatural powerṣ