60. Bhartri-yajna
Volume I: Part I pp. 551–553
An ancient Bhāṣyakāra mentioned by Medhātithi (on Manu 8. 3) – his views cited by Trikāṇḍamandana – he wrote bhāṣya on Kātyāyana śrautasūtra and Pāraskara gṛhyasūtra – probably he commented on Gautamadharmaśāstra – his explanation of Manu V. 143, Gaut. V. 41, XIV. 35–40, Vas. VIII. 1 quoted by Kalpataru – probably commented on Pāraskaragṛhya – flourished about 800 A. D.
— Synopsis by P.V. Kane, from History of Dharmaśāstra
60. Bhartri-yajna
60. Bhartryajña
This seems to have been a very ancient commentator. Medhātithi1 in his bhāsya on Manu 8. 3 says ‘other explanations have been well brought out by Bhartryajña and they should be understood from his work’. Trikānda-mandana (who flourished before 1100 A. D.) in his Āpastambasūtra-dhvanitārtha-kārikā2 (I. 41) refers to the views of Bhartr- yajña that one who had committed to memory the text of the sacred fires, though he may be innocent of the meaning of the Vedic textṣ From Ananta’s bhāsya it appears that Bhartryajña composed a bhāsya on the Kātyāyanaśrautasūtra which had been lost ( utsanna ) in the former’s day. From Gadādhara’s comments on the Pāraskaragrhyasūtra it appears that Bhartryajña commented on Pāraskara.3 The gṛhastha-ratnākara of Cāṇḍeśvara quotes Bhartryajña’s explanation of the word samvibhāga occurring in Gautamadharmasūtra (10. 39 ‘ svami riktha....samvibhāga-parigrahādihigameșu’)4 The Nityācāpradīpa (B. I. series) after quoting Gautamadharma sūtra (11. 29 varṇāśramāḥ svadharmaṇiṣṭhāḥ &c.) cites the comment of Bhartryajña5 on the word tac-cheṣa occurring in that sūtra. Therefore it appears probable that Bhartryajña like Asahāya was an ancient commentator of the Gautamadharmasūtra. The Grhastharatnākara, after quoting from Vasiṣṭha (17. 1) and Viṣṇu the well-known verse of the Aitareya-brāhmaṇa (ṛṇam-asmin sam-nayati) cites the explanation of Bhartryajña as to the word ‘ jātasya’ occurring thereiṇ6
The Kalpataru (on Brahmacāri° p. 15) quotes the expla nation of the words ‘ tataḥ śeṣena’ and also on p. 144 quotes the explanation of Manu V. 143 (ucchiṣṭena tu &c.) given by Viśvarūpa and Bhartryajña. Kalpa° (Śuddhikāṇdạ p. 101) quotes Gaut. XIV. 35-40 and Bhartryajña’s explanation of ‘ ante tvantyanām’ as ‘ navamāśaucānte’. Kalpataru (gṛhastha kāṇdạ p. 5) cites the explanation of Vaṣ Dh. S. VIII. 1 (Grhastho-vindeta) by Bhartryajña. Similarly, Kalpa° (Gr. p. 259) quotes Gaut. X. 39 (Svāmi riktha-kraya°) and cites the explanation of ‘ samvibhāga’ as ‘ mitradāya’ by Bhartryajña. Kalpa° (Niyatakāla p. 256) cites Yāj. I. 166 (śudreșu dāsa- gopāla°) and its explanation by Bhartryajña as ‘ yasya gāḥ pālayati tasyaiva bhojyānnaḥ’. Kalpa° on Niyat° p. 203 quotes Gaut. Dh°. S. V. 41 and the explanation of the word ‘ adhivṛkṣasūrya’ by both Maskarin and Bhartryajña as meaning ‘ sāyamkāla’ (evening). Vide an interesting paper by Prof. Baladeva Upādhyaya in I. H. Q. vol. XII p. 494-503, where he advances some grounds for holding that Bhartryajña commented on the Pāraskaragrhyā and preceded even Karka. The Vyavahāranirṇaya of Varadarāja (on p. 135) cites the view of Dhāreśvara, Asahāya and Śrīkara about the effect of not asserting one’s right against an interloper for a long time and of Asahāya on pp. 230, 455 also. Since Bhartryajña is quoted by Medhātithi who also men- tions Asahāya but not Viśvarūpa, it follows that Bhartryajña must have flourished before 800 A. D. and was probably a contemporary of or slightly later than Asahāya.